UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
new
Gut Guide online
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in endoscopy and how to avoid them

Jacques Deviere, Arnaud Lemmers

Summary

AI Generated

This material discusses diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic mistakes based on clinical experience and proposes evidence-based approaches to avoid them.

  • Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy are performed daily for nonspecific indications such as heartburn, pain, anaemia, bleeding, and workup of portal hypertension.
  • Some patients undergo multiple diagnostic endoscopic procedures over months with nonconclusive findings.
  • Diagnostic mistakes based on the authors' endoscopic experience are discussed using an evidence-based approach.
  • For therapeutic procedures like ERCP and resections, important mistakes often seen in practice with major patient consequences are presented, along with simple approaches to avoid them.
Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

References

Mistakes
References
Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5 Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8
1.
Cameron AJ, Higgins JA. Linear gastric erosion. A lesion associated with large diaphragmatic hernia and chronic blood loss anemia. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91: 338–342. [Link]
2.
Camus M, et al. Severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from linear gastric ulcers in large hiatal hernias: a large prospective case series of Cameron ulcers. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 397–400. [Link]
3.
Shin HJ, et al. Risk factors for Dieulafoy lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 228–233. [Link]
4.
Lara LF, et al. Dieulafoy lesions of the GI tract: localization and therapeutic outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3436–3441. [Link]
5.
Baxter M and Aly EH. Dieulafoy's lesion: current trends in diagnosis and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 548–554. [Link]
6.
Jeon HK and Kim GH. Endoscopic management of Dieulafoy's lesion. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 112–120. [Link]
7.
Hirano I. 2015 David Y Graham Lecture: The first two decades of eosinophilic esophagitis—from acid reflux to food allergy. Am J Gastro 2016; 111: 770–776. [Link]
8.
Spechler SJ, et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: e18–e13. [Link]
9.
Vahabzadeh B, et al. Validation of the Prague C and M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett’s esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 236–241. [Link]
10.
Patwardhan VR and Cardenas A. Review article: the management of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia in cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40: 354–362. [Link]
11.
Lemmers A, et al. Gastrointestinal polypoid lesions: a poorly known endoscopic feature of portal hypertension. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014; 2: 189–196. [Link]
12.
Pimentel-Nunes P, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guidelines. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829–854. [Link]
13.
Moss A, et al. Long-term adenomare currence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57–65. [Link]
14.
Dumonceau JM, et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 277–298. [Link]
15.
Albert J, et al. Anatomy of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. In Endoscopy retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)—Current practice and future perspectives. Uni-Med Verlag AG, 2015; pp.25–27.
16.
The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3–43. [Link]
17.
Rugge M, et al. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut 2007; 56: 631–636. [Link]
18.
Hayee B, et al. Magnification narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese literature for the Western endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 452–461. [Link]
19.
Hayashi N, et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625–632. [Link]
20.
Kudo S, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8–14. [Link]
21.
Bouchard S and Devière J. endoscopic treatment for complex biliary and pancreatic duct injuries. Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2014; 5: 2–12. [Link]
22.
Bouchard S, et al. Su1598 Endoscopic or combined endoscopic/percutaneous management of patients with complex bile duct injuries and biliary exclusion. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (Supplement): AB345–AB346. [Link]

Abstract

Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations are performed daily as routine diagnostic procedures in a large number of patients with nonspecific indications, such as heartburn, pain, anaemia, bleeding, workup of portal hypertension and so on. Most of the examinations will point to a classic diagnosis (e.g. peptic disease, cancer, variceal management), but sometimes we see patients who've had multiple diagnostic endoscopic procedures in the previous few months with nonconclusive findings. The diagnostic mistakes discussed here are those that sprang to mind based on our endoscopic experience and they are discussed in an evidence-based approach. For therapeutic endoscopic procedures (e.g. ERCP and resections), we present the most important mistakes that are often seen in our practice and have major consequences for the patient. We propose, from our experience, a simple approach to avoid these mistakes.

Topics

Endoscopy

Published

2024

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Hannah Gordon, Pradeep Mundre

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Abstract

Topics

Digestive Oncology IBD

Published

2026

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

David S. Sanders, Pradeep Mundre

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Abstract

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Published

2026

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Standards and Guidelines
New
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

ABSTRACT

Background

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers despite extensive efforts and research conducted over the past decades. To effectuate groundbreaking improvements in pancreatic cancer treatment, interdisciplinary and international collaboration is essential. Evidence-based guidelines, including state-of-the-art evidence and expert opinion, are crucial to guide medical specialists, researchers, and patients, especially on issues where consensus is still lacking. This article describes the methodological protocol for the development of the European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer. The guideline aims to identify current knowledge gaps on pancreatic cancer management, develop questions based on these knowledge gaps, and answer these questions with evidence-based recommendations supplemented, when evidence is lacking, with expert advice for treatment and future research.

Methods

This guideline development protocol is developed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The process is structured into six stages: First, 13 theme-based multidisciplinary working groups are established, comprising representatives from 30 European medical and patient societies. Second, these working groups identify the most relevant current knowledge gaps on pancreatic cancer within their theme and formulate key questions. Third, the available evidence to answer these key questions is obtained through systematic reviews and the certainty of evidence is assessed using the GRADE approach. Fourth, recommendations are developed based on the available evidence. Fifth, all participants reach consensus on the recommendations through a modified Delphi process. Sixth, the recommendations are discussed during an open conference, including an external validation committee.

Discussion

This methodological protocol of the European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer is designed to identify key knowledge gaps across 13 themes and formulate evidence-based recommendations. This guideline initiative unites 30 European medical and patient societies for pancreatic cancer.

Summary

  • Methodological protocol of an international multi-disciplinary guideline involving 30 European medical and patient societies.

  • This protocol highlights the six stages of the guideline development process, adhering to the key principles of the GRADE methodology, and thereby aims to maximise transparency and methodological quality.

  • With addressing knowledge gaps, this guideline will uncover areas with limited evidence. A priority rating for research needs, based on a survey, will be established, highlighting areas where future research is most warranted.

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Pancreas

Citation

Clinical and Public Health Guidelines 3 (2026)

Published

2026

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Massimiliano di Pietro, Pradeep Mundre

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Abstract

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Oesophagus

Published

2025

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Ana Catarina Garcia, Gonçalo Alexandrino

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

References

Mistakes
References
Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5 Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8
1.
Cameron AJ, Higgins JA. Linear gastric erosion. A lesion associated with large diaphragmatic hernia and chronic blood loss anemia. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91: 338–342. [Link]
2.
Camus M, et al. Severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from linear gastric ulcers in large hiatal hernias: a large prospective case series of Cameron ulcers. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 397–400. [Link]
3.
Shin HJ, et al. Risk factors for Dieulafoy lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 228–233. [Link]
4.
Lara LF, et al. Dieulafoy lesions of the GI tract: localization and therapeutic outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3436–3441. [Link]
5.
Baxter M and Aly EH. Dieulafoy's lesion: current trends in diagnosis and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 548–554. [Link]
6.
Jeon HK and Kim GH. Endoscopic management of Dieulafoy's lesion. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 112–120. [Link]
7.
Hirano I. 2015 David Y Graham Lecture: The first two decades of eosinophilic esophagitis—from acid reflux to food allergy. Am J Gastro 2016; 111: 770–776. [Link]
8.
Spechler SJ, et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: e18–e13. [Link]
9.
Vahabzadeh B, et al. Validation of the Prague C and M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett’s esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 236–241. [Link]
10.
Patwardhan VR and Cardenas A. Review article: the management of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia in cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40: 354–362. [Link]
11.
Lemmers A, et al. Gastrointestinal polypoid lesions: a poorly known endoscopic feature of portal hypertension. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014; 2: 189–196. [Link]
12.
Pimentel-Nunes P, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guidelines. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829–854. [Link]
13.
Moss A, et al. Long-term adenomare currence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57–65. [Link]
14.
Dumonceau JM, et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 277–298. [Link]
15.
Albert J, et al. Anatomy of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. In Endoscopy retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)—Current practice and future perspectives. Uni-Med Verlag AG, 2015; pp.25–27.
16.
The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3–43. [Link]
17.
Rugge M, et al. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut 2007; 56: 631–636. [Link]
18.
Hayee B, et al. Magnification narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese literature for the Western endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 452–461. [Link]
19.
Hayashi N, et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625–632. [Link]
20.
Kudo S, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8–14. [Link]
21.
Bouchard S and Devière J. endoscopic treatment for complex biliary and pancreatic duct injuries. Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2014; 5: 2–12. [Link]
22.
Bouchard S, et al. Su1598 Endoscopic or combined endoscopic/percutaneous management of patients with complex bile duct injuries and biliary exclusion. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (Supplement): AB345–AB346. [Link]

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains an important global health concern. It is estimated that there are approximately 50 million people infected with HCV globally, with around 1 million new infections each year and about 242,000 deaths annually attributed to HCV-related complications. Most acute HCV infections (55–85%) become chronic due to the virus’s effective evasion strategies, with spontaneous clearance being rare once chronicity is established. This condition often progresses silently, with many individuals unaware of their infection until advanced liver damage has occurred. If left untreated, HCV can lead to severe complications, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCV transmission occurs mainly through percutaneous exposure to infected blood. HCV can also spread from mother to infant (vertical transmission) and, less frequently, via sexual contact.1,2 In recent years, the introduction of oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), with remarkable safety and effectiveness profiles, has led to a sustained virological response (SVR) in virtually all (>97%) HCV-infected patients, regardless of HCV genotype or disease stage. However, significant barriers remain, such as issues with diagnosis, access to treatment and awareness of the disease.

Here, we discuss some of the misconceptions in HCV management and provide a practical management approach grounded in evidence and clinical experience.

Topics

Hepatobiliary

Citation

Garcia A.C and Alexandrino G. Mistakes in hepatits C and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2025; 25: 14-17.

Published

2025

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

Main Recommendations

At a population level, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) suggest endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (and precancerous conditions) in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate [ASR] > 20 per 100 000 person-years) every 2 to 3 years or, if cost–effectiveness has been proven, in intermediate risk regions (ASR 10–20 per 100 000 person-years) every 5 years, but not in low-risk regions (ASR < 10).

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that irrespective of country of origin, individual gastric risk assessment and stratification of precancerous conditions is recommended for first-time gastroscopy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80 should be discontinued or not started, and that patients’ comorbidities should be considered when treatment of superficial lesions is planned.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that a high quality endoscopy including the use of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, is performed for screening, diagnosis, and staging of precancerous conditions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia) and lesions (dysplasia or cancer), as well as after endoscopic therapy. VCE should be used to guide the sampling site for biopsies in the case of suspected neoplastic lesions as well as to guide biopsies for diagnosis and staging of gastric precancerous conditions, with random biopsies to be taken in the absence of endoscopically suspected changes. When there is a suspected early gastric neoplastic lesion, it should be properly described (location, size, Paris classification, vascular and mucosal pattern), photodocumented, and two targeted biopsies taken.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP do not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection unless there are signs of deep submucosal invasion or if the lesion is not considered suitable for endoscopic resection.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated gastric lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low grade and high grade) or as intramucosal carcinoma (of any size if not ulcerated or ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR being an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions of size ≤ 10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that a decision about ESD can be considered for malignant lesions clinically staged as having minimal submucosal invasion if differentiated and ≤ 30 mm; or for malignant lesions clinically staged as intramucosal, undifferentiated and ≤ 20 mm; and in both cases with no ulcerative findings.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommends patient management based on the following histological risk after endoscopic resection:

Curative/very low-risk resection (lymph node metastasis [LNM] risk < 0.5 %–1 %): en bloc R0 resection; dysplastic/pT1a, differentiated lesion, no lymphovascular invasion, independent of size if no ulceration and ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated. No further staging procedure or treatment is recommended.

Curative/low-risk resection (LNM risk < 3 %): en bloc R0 resection; lesion with no lymphovascular invasion and: a) pT1b, invasion ≤ 500 µm, differentiated, size ≤ 30 mm; or b) pT1a, undifferentiated, size ≤ 20 mm and no ulceration. Staging should be completed, and further treatment is generally not necessary, but a multidisciplinary discussion is required.

Local-risk resection (very low risk of LNM but increased risk of local persistence/recurrence): Piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin of a lesion otherwise meeting curative/very low-risk criteria (or meeting low-risk criteria provided that there is no submucosal invasive tumor at the resection margin in the case of piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin for pT1b lesions [invasion ≤ 500 µm; well-differentiated; size ≤ 30 mm, and VM0]). Endoscopic surveillance/re-treatment is recommended rather than other additional treatment.

High-risk resection (noncurative): Any lesion with any of the following: (a) a positive vertical margin (if carcinoma) or lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion (> 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae); (b) poorly differentiated lesions if ulceration or size > 20 mm; (c) pT1b differentiated lesions with submucosal invasion ≤ 500 µm with size > 30 mm; or (d) intramucosal ulcerative lesion with size > 30 mm. Complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments (surgery) in multidisciplinary discussion.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest the use of validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e. g. Kimura–Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e. g. endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia [EGGIM]) to endoscopically stage precancerous conditions and stratify the risk for gastric cancer.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that biopsies should be taken from at least two topographic sites (2 biopsies from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, guided by VCE) in two separate, clearly labeled vials. Additional biopsy from the incisura is optional.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3 + or EGGIM 5 +) or advanced histological stages of atrophic gastritis (severe atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia, or changes in both antrum and corpus, operative link on gastritis assessment/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia [OLGA/OLGIM] III/IV) should be followed up with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of the individual’s country of origin.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that no surveillance is proposed for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection). This group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend H. pylori eradication for patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients should be advised to stop smoking and low-dose daily aspirin use may be considered for the prevention of gastric cancer in selected individuals with high risk for cardiovascular events.

Publishers

European Society of Pathology logoEuropean Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group logoEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logo
European Society of Pathology, European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Endoscopy Stomach & H. Pylori

Citation

Endoscopy 2025; 57(05): 504-554

Published

2025

More Like This:

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Malignancy in IBD with Hannah Gordon

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Hannah Gordon

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Coeliac disease with David Sanders

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, David S. Sanders

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

The European Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline on Pancreatic Cancer: Methodological Protocol

Laura Leeuwenburgh Laura Leeuwenburgh

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 2)

Pradeep Mundre Pradeep Mundre, Massimiliano di Pietro

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.