Introduction

Sigmoid volvulus is usually managed by endoscopic detorsion in the absence of complications, while surgery is reserved for severe cases. However, recurrence rates remain high, ranging from 18% to 90% (1). The guidelines from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (1) recommend prophylactic surgery, although the optimal timing is not defined. In Europe, most cases are sporadic and affect elderly patients with comorbidities. However, large studies mainly originate from endemic regions, which limits their applicability to Western settings. Moreover, there is a lack of large-scale data focusing specifically on the endoscopic management of sigmoid volvulus.

Aims & Methods

The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with sigmoid volvulus managed by endoscopic detorsion during out-of-hours emergency endoscopy shifts across multiple centers.
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study (8 centers), including all patients who underwent endoscopy for suspected sigmoid volvulus during on-call digestive endoscopy shifts between March 2016 and December 2023. Procedures were performed by the POET group (Parisian On-call Endoscopy Team), a mobile unit composed of an endoscopist and a nurse, covering urgent endoscopy during nights and weekends in Paris and suburbs (6.9 million inhabitants), using a portable system (2).

Results

A total of 404 patients were included. Median age was 72 years (IQR 59; 83), 69% were male, 19% institutionalized, 40% had neurocognitive disorders, 26% had anatomical abnormalities of the colon and 45% had constipation. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (53%), bowel obstruction (17%), and constipation (20%). Endoscopic detorsion was successful in 92% of cases, with a 2% perforation rate and 89% of clinical success. Predictors of technical failure included ischemia at endoscopy (OR 0,16 [0,07-0,37], p<0,0001) and history of abdominal surgery (OR=0,44 [0,2;0,99], p=0,0463). Ischemia was independently associated with initial CRP ≥ 27 mg/L (OR=2,24 [1,11-4,54], p=0,0253), time to endoscopy ≥ 10h (OR=2,38 [1,28-4,39], p=0,0058), and radiological signs of severity (OR=4,13 [1,82-9,36], p=0,0007). All 24 patients with colonic necrosis at endoscopy died without emergency surgery, regardless of the success of detorsion (58% in this subgroup). In 28% of cases, endoscopy was performed for recurrence. Among patients with a first episode, recurrence occurred in 40%, with 50% occurring within 12 days. Endoscopic success was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (OR=4,39 [1,18-16,32], p=0,0271). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was <10%; overall mortality at the latest follow-up was 31% (median follow-up : 9 months, IQR 2-31).

Conclusion

Emergency endoscopic detorsion is highly effective with low morbidity. However, in the presence of colonic necrosis, endoscopic treatment is ineffective and uniformly fatal without surgical intervention. Optimal patient selection is therefore critical, and relies on early identification of predictive factors for ischemia. Volvulus recurrence is frequent and early, highlighting the need for systematic prophylactic treatment following successful detorsion. Elective surgery during the same hospitalization should be considered whenever possible. For patients with surgical contraindications, endoscopic sigmoidopexy may offer a viable alternative.

References

1. Alavi K, Poylin V, Davids JS, Patel SV, Felder S, Valente MA, Paquette IM, Feingold DL; Prepared on behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colonic Volvulus and Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Sep 1;64(9):1046-1057. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002159. PMID: 34016826.
2. Camus M, Becq A, Jaïs B; Parisian On-Call Endoscopy Team; Dray X. Resource-sparing urgent endoscopies by a mobile on-call team in the Paris area during the COVID-19 outbreak. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):447-448. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 16. PMID: 32305344; PMCID: PMC7161514.

Introduction

Prospective evidence of the long-term efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) is insufficient.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to evaluate long-term ESD outcomes for T1 CRC, focusing on the risk stratification criteria and necessity of additional surgery.
This large-scale, multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted by Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. All consecutive patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2014 and December 2018 were included, and those with pathologically confirmed T1 CRC were analyzed. Patients were classified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in JSCCR guidelines. High-risk patients were categorized into those who underwent additional surgery (surgery group) and those who were followed up without surgery (follow-up group).

Results

Among 2357 patients who underwent ESD for 2478 early colorectal neoplasms, 431 were diagnosed with T1 CRC. Ten recurrences (2.6%) and five T1 CRC-associated deaths (1.3%) occurred in the high-risk group, with none in the low-risk group. Five-year cumulative overall and local recurrence rates were significantly higher in the follow-up versus surgery group (7.7% and 1.9%; P=0.019 versus 6.4% and 0%; P<0.001), with no local recurrence in the surgery group. Five-year overall survival was significantly worse in the follow-up group (79.5% and 95.2%; P<0.001), while no significant difference was found in 5-y disease-specific survival (98.5% and 98.5%; P=0.447).

Conclusion

No recurrence or mortality occurred in the low-risk group, suggesting that intensive surveillance may be unnecessary for these patients after curative ESD. Additional surgery could prevent local recurrence for high-risk T1 CRC, supporting a risk-based treatment approach.

Introduction

The achievement of histological remission (HR) is a key treatment goal in ulcerative colitis (UC), as it is suggestive of better disease management and predicts response to therapy.
The absence of neutrophils in epithelium and lamina is crucial to define HR. However, the role of neutrophil number and localisation remains unclear. We aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-driven system to automate neutrophil detection, localisation, and quantification, supporting assessment of HR and enable the prediction of response to therapy.

Aims & Methods

We developed an AI-driven system by integrating two deep learning models to (1) segment whole slide images (WSIs) into epithelium, crypts and lamina propria and to (2) detect and quantify neutrophils. Outputs from these models were combined to compute neutrophil densities in the lamina propria, epithelium, and overall tissue. The optimal neutrophil density cut-offs to assess disease activity (Geboes score >2B.0) in UC patients were identified in the AMAC phase 2 Mirikizumab trial, and subsequently validated in the multicentre prospective PICaSSO cohort study. Cut-offs to determine treatment response at weeks 12 and 52 (histological improvement [HI; Geboes score ≤3.1] and histological remission [HR; Geboes score ≤2B.0]), were also evaluated.

Results

Table 1 shows the system diagnostic performance in assessing disease activity and predicting response to therapy at W12 and W52 in the Mirikizumab cohort.
303 WSIs from active UC patients from the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial of Mirikizumab were analysed. The model yielded a DICE SØrensen of 0.57 for segmentation, precision of 82.3% and recall of 77.0% for neutrophil detection. The system identified an overall optimal neutrophil density cut-off (cells/mm²) predictive of disease activity of >21.7.0 (>10.1 and >30.4 for epithelium and lamina propria, respectively), with an accuracy of 86% (85% and 85%, respectively). Further validation in the multicenter PICaSSO cohort yielded to similar results.
Moreover, the overall optimal cut-off to predict histological remission at W52 was <20.8 (<10.4 and <27.9 for epithelium and lamina propria, respectively), with an accuracy of 82.0% (81% and 80%, respectively).

Conclusion

Our novel AI-based system demonstrates strong potential as an automated tool to detect, localise, and quantify neutrophils to assess histological activity and predict response to therapy in a clinical trial UC cohort and real-world settings. This framework could be applied in clinical trials and routine clinical practice, offering objective guidance for personalised management in UC patients.

References

[1] Santacroce G, Meseguer P, Zammarchi I, et al. P406 A novel active learning-based digital pathology protocol annotation for histologic assessment in Ulcerative Colitis using PICaSSO Histologic Remission Index (PHRI). Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Pages i843–i844
[2] Graham S, Vu QD, Jahanifar M, et al. CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the frontiers of nuclear detection, segmentation, classification and counting. Med Image Anal. 2024;92:103047.

Disclosure

MI received research grants and consultant fees from Olympus, Pentax, Eli Lilly, and Janssen. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for superficial esophageal cancer, but postoperative stenosis remains a significant concern. Particularly, probability of the stenosis is less investigated in cases with a 50%-75% circumferential mucosal defect.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to identify influential factors for postoperative stenosis after the moderate circumferential resection in esophageal ESD. This multi-center retrospective observational study analyzed data from 513 patients across 19 institutions who underwent esophageal ESD from April 2018 to March 2022 and showed 50% to 75% of the circumferential mucosal defect. We firstly overviewed the current status on the postoperative stenosis, the steroid use, and postoperative adverse events in these patients. Subsequently, we identified influential factors for postoperative stenosis. Patients were categorized into stenosis and no stenosis groups, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for each parameter. We further investigated influential factors of stenosis in two cohorts: steroid and no steroid groups. Finally, the parameters were compared between the steroid and no steroid groups to assess the tendency of the steroid use in general practice.

Results

Postoperative stenosis was observed in 28 cases (5%). Univariate analysis comparing the stenosis group (n = 28) and no stenosis group (n = 485) revealed significant differences in the prior endoscopic treatment near the lesion (p = 0.02), cervical esophageal location (p = 0.04), defect circumference (p =0.01), and procedure duration (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the steroid use between two groups. Multivariate analyses identified history of prior endoscopic treatment close to the lesion (p = 0.01, odds ratio [OR], 5.10), cervical esophageal lesions (p = 0.03, OR, 3.97), large circumferential defect (p <0.01, OR, 3.78), and longer procedure duration (p <0.01, OR, 3.83) as independent risk factors for stenosis formation. Among the steroid group, significant associations of the postoperative stenosis were revealed with the prior endoscopic treatment near the lesion (p = 0.02), cervical esophageal location (p = 0.04), and >5/8 of defect circumference (p = 0.02). In the no steroid group, only the procedure duration (p = 0.01) showed a significant difference between the stenosis and non-stenosis groups. Comparison between the steroid (n = 223) and no steroid groups (n = 290) revealed significant differences in the prior endoscopic treatment near the lesion (p <0.01), cervical esophageal lesions (p <0.01), and resected specimen dimensions (p <0.01). The stenosis rates were 7% in the steroid group and 4% in the no steroid group, without a significant difference. No significant difference in adverse events was observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

In esophageal ESD with a 50%-75% circumferential mucosal defect, the steroid was used in over 40% of patients, and postoperative stenosis still occurred in 5%. Because wider circumference, location of the cervical esophagus, prior endoscopic treatment close to the lesion, and prolonged operative time were identified as independent risk factors on the stenosis, steroid therapy should be preferred in these cases. Particularly, lesions with a history of endoscopic treatment, on cervical esophagus, and with >5/8 of defect circumference should require more aggressive countermeasures than currently applied.

Introduction

The vacuum-assisted closure stent (VAC-stent) is a novel approach for managing esophageal defects, combining endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and metal stent support to promote effective tissue healing [1].
We present a case of esophageal perforation following circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), successfully managed with a VAC-Stent (video 1).

Aims & Methods

We report a case of a 59-year-old man with a 40mm lesion involving 75% of the esophageal circumference (Paris 0-IIa + Is), arising in Barrett’s esophagus (Prague C4M5) and consistent with adenocarcinoma, who was referred to our unit. CT scans excluded metastatic disease, and after multidisciplinary consultation, ESD was planned.

Results

Circumferential ESD was performed using a triple-tunnel approach. After the resection, muscular tears were closed with through-the-scope (TTS) clips, and pre-emptive Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) was applied to enhance granulation and healing.
Due to rising inflammatory markers and fever onset, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed on the 3rd Post-Operative Day (POD). The EGD revealed two <5mm perforations 4cm apart, and a VAC-stent was placed to bridge the defects. At the follow-up EGD on the 9th POD, a single defect remained, and a new VAC-Stent was placed. The patient showed progressive clinical improvement and successfully resumed a liquid diet. By the 15th POD, the perforations had healed.
The patient was discharged in good clinical condition on the 18th POD.
At the EGD on the 30th POD, homogeneous healing tissue was observed, with no stricture detected at the resection site.
Histological analysis of the ESD specimen revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion: pT1b (sm1) pNX G2, with R0 resection achieved and no high-risk pathological features. An oncological and endoscopic follow-up was planned.

Conclusion

Our case demonstrates that the VAC-Stent is a safe and effective method for treating perforations following esophageal ESD. In cases of circumferential ESD, VAC-stent use may also help prevent strictures.

References

[1]. Dell’Anna G, Fanti L, Fanizza J, et al. VAC-Stent in the Treatment of Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leaks: A New “Kid on the Block” Who Marries the Best of Old Techniques—A Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024; 13: 3805. doi:10.3390/jcm13133805