Introduction

An important issue for unresectable advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients with Child-Pugh class B liver cirrhosis (CP-B), is lack of safe treatment options that show therapeutic efficacy, thus it is considered to be an unmet need. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (At/Bv) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) have each been used as first-line systemic immunotherapy for uHCC.

Aims & Methods

The present study aimed to elucidate clinical outcomes of uHCC patients with CP-B treated with those combination treatments. The records of 169 uHCC patients with CP-B in Japan, treated with At/Bv or Dur/Tre as first-line systemic therapy from 2020 to 2024 at participating institutions were examined (median age: 73 years, males: 143, Child-Pugh score 7:8:9 = 121:43:5, BCLC stage B:C = 65:104, At/Bv:Dur/Tre = 131:38). Each regimen was analyzed for therapeutic efficacy and safety, and the results compared, in a retrospective manner.

Results

Using RECIST, ver. 1.1, the objective response rate (ORR) was shown to be 25.9% in the At/Bv group, and 18.4% in the Dur/Tre group (p=0.08). Disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in the At/Bv group (64.9% vs. 39.5%, p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for progression-free survival (PFS) [At/Bv vs. Dur/Tre=5.3 vs. 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.9–6.5 and 2.3–7.2, respectively), p=0.90], overall survival (OS) [10.5 vs. 12.5 months (95% CI: 9.1–13.3 and 7.9–NA, respectively), p=0.58], or post-progression survival (PPS) [4.9 vs. 7.5 months (95% CI: 3.7–7.5 and 2.2–NA, respectively), p=0.60]. The rate of incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade was 11.5% in the At/Bv group and 23.7% in the Dur/Tre group (p=0.07), while irAEs of grade 3 or higher were noted in 3.1% and 15.8%, respectively (p=0.02) significantly greater in the Dur/Tre group).

Conclusion

The incidence rate of irAEs in each group was similar to that observed in clinical trials previously performed for these regimens. uHCC patients with CP-B, who received Dur/Tre had a greater rate of incidence of high-grade irAEs, while the At/Bv group had a better DCR, though there were no significant differences for PFS, OS, or PPS between the groups. Neither treatment was found to sufficiently improve the prognosis of uHCC patients with CP-B. Development of safe and effective treatment options for patients affected by uHCC, that can be administered even to those with CP-B remains necessary.

Disclosure

Atsushi Hiraoka: lecture fee Chugai, AstraZeneca, and Lilly.

Introduction

Current treatment options for IBD are limited by low clinical remission rates and loss of response. Most therapies target single pathogenic pathways and while combinations of biologics targeting different pathogenic cytokines can increase clinical remission rates, dosing schedules are inconvenient. JAK inhibitors, target multiple cytokine pathways, but are limited by safety concerns.
Salt-inducible kinases (SIKs) are a subfamily of serine/threonine kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) family and act as key regulators of immune cell signaling. SIK inhibitors have been shown to target multiple cytokine pathways.
Three SIK isoforms exist: SIK1, SIK2 and SIK3. SIK inhibitors targeting multiple isoforms have been investigated in clinical trials. Although there have been signals of activity in patients with ulcerative colitis and psoriasis, limited efficacy and safety concerns related to SIK1 and 2 inhibition have hampered their development.

Aims & Methods

We performed structure based drug design to identify highly potent and selective SIK3 inhibitors that could offerbest in class efficacy and safety for the treatment of various auto-immune diseases. Our effort led to to the discovery of 100s of compounds spanning SIK3 binding sites. Compounds were tested in protein and cell-based assays to evaluate potency and selectivity against SIK3 and in a phenotypic human whole blood TNFα assay. Lead optimization involving rigorous testing in safety and pharmacology panels, resulted in the selection of lead candidates that were tested in a variety of translational models to identify the most efficacious compounds. Human PK predictions were performed using non-clinical in vivo PK assessments and allometric scaling leading to the selection of the drug candidate, which entered GLP toxicology studies.

Results

O3R-5671 is a highly potent and specific SIK3 inhibitor with sub-nanomolar potency for SIK3 and low activity against SIK1 and 2 and over all human kinases. It demonstrated potent activity in a panel of human primary phenotypic cell assays inhibiting TNFα, IL-12, and IL-23 release in LPS-stimulated myeloid cells, and inhibiting TNFa release in LPS-stimulated human whole blood. O3R-5671 also inhibited activation of TCR-stimulated human primary T cells and induced IL-10 secretion from myeloid cells.
In vivo, O3R-5671 demonstrated dose-dependent activity in a mouse LPS challenge model, dose-dependent efficacy in two distinct mouse models of IBD, and dose-dependent efficacy in mouse models of IL-23-induced psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Cross-species PK and allometric scaling were used to predict O3R-5671’s human PK profile- which is expected to be conducive to potent SIK3 inhibition and clinical efficacy in patients with IBD.
O3R-5671 demonstrated a highly attractive profile in ADME and in vitro safety panels. Six-week GLP toxicity studies in rats and dogs established no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) which support dosing in humans with doses that are predicted to be pharmacologically active with a large safety margin.

Conclusion

O3R-5671 is a highly specific and potent SIK3 inhibitor that is predicted to have a flat PK profile in humans. These properties should allow O3R-5671 to apply strong drug pressure on SIK3 while sparing SIK1 and 2. This is expected to result in the inhibition of multiple pathogenic cytokines including TNFa and IL-23, both of which have been validated as IBD targets. A clinical trial is ongoing to establish the safety and PK profile of O3R-5671 and understand its effect on pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

Disclosure

All authors were employed by Galapagos who discovered O3R-5671 or Novalix, a CRO that was employed by Galapagos. Some authors are employed by Onco3R therapeutics, who are currently developing O3R-5671

Introduction

Pathological esophageal acid exposure may persist in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) despite standard proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and symptom control, although current guidelines recommend at least standard-dose PPI for all patients with BE.¹

Aims & Methods

Aim was to evaluate the role of esophageal function testing in assessing acid exposure in BE patients on PPI therapy and in predicting neoplastic progression. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including asymptomatic BE patients (defined by GerdQ total score <8 and a score of 0 on the first GerdQ item) who underwent high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH impedance monitoring while on various PPI regimens. Maximal PPI therapy included esomeprazole 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, or lansoprazole 30 mg, all administered twice daily. All other regimens were considered standard dosing. Index upper endoscopy with biopsies was performed under the same therapeutic regimen. Histologically, presence and degree of neoplasia (all confirmed by a second pathologist) was recorded. Acid exposure time (AET) <4% was defined as adequate acid control; AET >6% as pathological reflux. Predictors of pathological reflux and neoplasia were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 135 patients (2016-2025) were included (mean age 58 ± 15 years; 73% male). Median BE length was C1 (range 0–3 cm) and M2 (range 1–5 cm), with 41% (n=56) classified as having long-segment BE. Sixty-seven patients (50%) were on standard-dose PPI. Pathological reflux was identified in 37 patients (27%), of whom 25 (67%) were on standard-dose therapy. Fourteen patients (10%) had borderline AET values (4–6%). Among the 84 patients (62%) with adequate acid control, 33 (39%) were taking standard-dose PPI. On multivariable analysis, standard-dose PPI (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.34–6.89; p=0.008) and type III esophagogastric junction morphology (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.01–5.01; p=0.047), consistent with manometric hiatal hernia, were independently associated with pathological reflux. Non-dysplastic BE was found in 112 patients, while 13 (10%) had neoplasia at index endoscopy (8 low-grade dysplasia, 3 high-grade dysplasia, 2 intramucosal adenocarcinoma). Pathological reflux was the only independent predictor of neoplasia (OR 10.41; 95% CI 2.65–41.26; p<0.001).

Table 1. Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with neoplasia on index endoscopy.

Conclusion

Nearly one-third of asymptomatic BE patients exhibit pathological reflux on pH-monitoring despite PPI treatment, predominantly among those on standard-dose and with manometric hiatal hernia. Nonetheless, adequate acid control is achieved in over one-third of patients on standard PPI therapy. Pathological reflux is associated with a 10-fold increased risk of neoplasia.

References

1. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(4):559-587.

Introduction

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 250 risk variants linked to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Most genetic variants increase the risk of disease onset, and their impact on clinical presentation is limited.^1,2,3 Variants in NOD2 and IL23R not only modulate the risk of disease onset, but also influence disease behaviour and localisation. Their role in predicting treatment response remains unclear.^3,4
A variant in an intron of TNRC18 (rs7486781, allele frequency 3.6%) was recently identified as having a strong risk-increasing effect (OR 3.2, p=2.4x10-61) for IBD in the FinnGen biobank study. The same allele was also associated with a risk for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), uveitis and psoriasis.⁵ The functional effect of rs7486781 is not yet fully established.⁶

Aims & Methods

The FinnGen biobank study includes the genotype data of 520 000 individuals and their longitudinal register data from national health registers, including 11 298 individuals with verified diagnosis for IBD. The data also include drug purchases, procedure codes and laboratory measurements of the individuals.
Our aim was to study the impact of the TNRC18-variant on IBD phenotype, particularly disease behavior. We assessed established aspects of disease severity⁷: use of immunosuppressants and advanced therapies, necessity to switch medications, frequent use of corticosteroids and risk of procedures. We also evaluated the presence of extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) and other disease complications.

Results

Regarding disease severity, the use of therapies beyond 5-ASA was more common among variant carriers; the use of thiopurines and other immunosuppressants (OR 1.21-1.27, p-values 1.35x10^-5 - 0.00849), ustekinumab and other IL-inhibitors (OR 1.46-1.48, p-values 0.00324 - 0.00286) and TNF-α-inhibitors (OR 1.26, p=0.00753) was more frequent.
In addition, perianal and anal canal operations were more prevalent with TNRC18 variant carriers (OR 2.44, p=1.41x10^-4), indicating perianal disease.
Assessing EIM, we observed that diagnoses for AS and uveitis (OR 1.62-1.67, p=1.3x10^-5 - 1.55x10^-4) were more frequent within IBD in patients with rs7486781.
Interestingly, a reduced risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was implicated by lower number of cholangitis (K83.0) diagnoses (OR 0.617, p=0.00221) and fewer purchases of ursodeoxycholic acid (OR 0.55, p=2.83x10^-5), in addition to lower levels of ALP (mean 75 vs 82, p=0.00296), IgG4 (mean 0.45 g/l vs 0.81 g/l, p=4.81x10^-5) and IgM (0.12 vs 0.15, p=0.00115) among variant carriers. All events survived the false discovery rate–adjusted p threshold of 0.05.
Our results also suggest that the cumulative risk for IBD related procedures⁸ (patients with procedures n=2209) from diagnosis and birth were elevated in TNRC18 variant carriers (HR=1.12 and HR=1.14, p=0.050 and p=0.023, assuming additive effect) using a Cox regression model.
Finally, our results in ulcerative colitis indicate that TNRC18 variant carriers are at higher risk of transitioning from 5-ASA/immunomodulators to biologics/JAK-inhibitors (HR=1.38, p=0.016). Variant carriers receiving immunomodulators or advanced therapies were not, however, in increased risk of colectomy (HR~0.97-1.34, p~0.86-0.37).

Conclusion

TNRC18 variant was associated with greater risk of operative treatment, the need of more advanced medication and perianal disease. AS and uveitis were more common EIMs, but PSC appeared less infrequent. Our preliminary results indicate that TNRC18 variant carriers might benefit from early intervention with immunomodulators or advanced therapies.

References

1. Chang, J. T. Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. N Engl J Med 383, 2652–2664 (2020).

2. Cleynen, I. et al. Inherited determinants of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: a genetic association study. Lancet 387, 156–167 (2016).

3. Atreya, R. & Neurath, M. F. Biomarkers for Personalizing IBD Therapy: The Quest Continues. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 22, 1353–1364 (2024).

4. Kayali, S. et al. NOD2 and Crohn’s Disease Clinical Practice: From Epidemiology to Diagnosis and Therapy, Rewired. Inflamm Bowel Dis 31, 552–562 (2025).

5. Kurki, M. I. et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 613, 508–518 (2023).

6. Rahimov, F. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen supported by human genetics identifies the TNRC18 gene locus as a novel regulator of inflammatory signaling. bioRxiv 2023.10.04.560902 (2023) doi:10.1101/2023.10.04.560902.

7. Swaminathan, A. et al. The Disease Severity Index for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is a Valid Instrument that Predicts Complicated Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 30, 2064–2075 (2024).

Disclosure

Anna Aarni: Speaker fee from Abbvie, Clinic visit: travelling expenses from Tillots Pharma

Pauliina Molander: Speaker, consultancy and advisory board member fees from Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Pfizer and Takeda. Clinic visit: traveling expenses from Tillots Pharma

Jukka Koskela: Pfizer-FinnGen genetic advisory board, traveling, clinic and congress visits: FinnGen partners, Tillots Pharma, Takeda, consulting: Pfizer