Introduction
High-quality endoscopy training is essential for safe and effective endoscopic practice. The ESGE and ESGENA position statement published in 2023 provides structured recommendations for basic endoscopy training (1). However, the extent to which these recommendations have been implemented across Europe has not been systematically assessed.
Aims & Methods
This study aimed to assess current basic endoscopy training practices across Europe, identify gaps between current practice and the ESGE/ESGENA position statement, and explore reasons for these differences to improve future training.
A survey was distributed through the Friends of the UEG Young Talent Group network from September 2025 to January 2026. Eligible participants were gastroenterology trainees and specialists with <10 years of endoscopy experience who had completed their training in Europe. Based on the ESGE/ESGENA position statement, the survey assessed training structure, content, competency assessment, procedure volume, and training satisfaction.
Results
A total of 795 responses were received from 40 countries, of which 710 met inclusion criteria; 47% female, 53% male, and 0.3% non-binary. Half of the trainees (53%) started endoscopy training in their first two years, and only 12% in their last two years. Structured assessments were reported by 65% of respondents, mostly occasional/informal (regular and formal 2.5%), while 35% reported no assessment during training.
Observation (94%) and self-learning (81%) were the most common training elements, while for roughly a third of respondents; lectures, endoscopic workshops, and simulation training were also included. Notably, nearly a third (27%) reported no structured training (e.g., self-taught). Of those who used simulation training, 75% considered it helpful.
Only 26% reported having a formally assigned supervisor; 36% stated their supervisors lacked formal training in teaching endoscopy, while 24% did not know. 26% reported having a logbook for both official purposes and training progression, while 39% used one for official purposes only.
Key barriers to high-quality endoscopy training were lack of structured teaching (68%), limited access to procedures due to clinical workload (58%) and pressure to complete procedures due to service demands (54%). Mean satisfaction score was 3.4/5 (5=highest satisfaction).
Further analyses of procedure volumes, training elements, and subgroup comparisons will be published separately.
Conclusion
These findings suggest substantial gaps between ESGE/ESGENA position statement and real-world basic endoscopy training across Europe. Recognising and addressing these gaps is key to improving current practice. By including respondents with varying years of endoscopy experience, this study may provide a baseline for future comparisons before and after publication of the 2023 position statement, pending further subgroup analyses.
References
1. Antonelli G, Voiosu AM, Pawlak KM, Gonçalves TC, Le N, Bronswijk M, ym. Training in basic gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. helmikuuta 2024;56(02):131–50. doi:10.1055/a-2205-2613
Disclosure
a