Introduction
Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a common and life-threatening complication of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Despite advances in therapeutic strategies, the 6-week mortality rate remains high, ranging from 10% to 20%. Current clinical guidelines recommend standard treatment for cirrhotic patients with AVB, including vasoactive agents, prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic intervention. However, real-world clinical practices are often influenced by physician awareness, institutional resources, and patient preferences. In late 2019, West China Hospital of Sichuan University established a multidisciplinary rapid-response pathway for the emergency management of high-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). This initiative aimed to improve the treatment protocol, integrate endoscopic and interventional resources, and finally improve the outcomes.
Aims & Methods
The present study evaluates the impact of this rapid-response pathway on clinical outcomes in cirrhotic patients with AVB. This retrospective study included consecutive patients admitted for acute UGIB to West China Hospital between January 2016 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) cirrhosis; and (2) presentation with hematemesis and/or melena within five days before admission. Exclusion criteria included: (1) non-variceal bleeding or an unconfirmed bleeding source on endoscopy; and (2) less than six weeks of follow-up. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the timing of rapid-response pathway implementation: Group A (2016–2019, pre-implementation) and Group B (2020–2022, post-implementation). Primary outcomes were 6-week mortality and 5-day treatment failure. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust for baseline confounders: a 1:1 PSM was used to compare Group A and B.
Results
A total of 1,529 cirrhotic patients with AVB were included. Following 1:1 PSM, Groups A and B comprised 654 patients each. The most common etiology of cirrhosis is chronic hepatitis B virus infection. No significant intergroup differences were observed in Child-Pugh score, MELD score, MELD-Na score, prevalence of PVT, HCC, infection, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy (all P > 0.05). Group B had a higher rate of prophylactic antibiotics, early endoscopic or interventional treatment use, and less balloon tamponade and intubation. Group B demonstrated significantly lower 6-week mortality compared to Group A [52 (8.0%) vs. 88 (13.5%), P = 0.001]. Multivariate Cox regression identified Child-Pugh score (HR = 1.203), MELD-Na score (HR = 1.040), PVT (HR = 1.733), HCC (HR = 2.398), and 5-day treatment failure (HR = 4.385) as independent risk factors for 6-week mortality. Similarly, Group B exhibited a significantly reduced 5-day treatment failure rate [64 (9.8%) vs. 137 (20.9%), P < 0.001]. While no significant differences in overall 6-week mortality or 5-day treatment failure were observed between the PVT and non-PVT groups, patients with coPVT had significantly higher 6-week mortality compared to non-PVT patients (HR = 4.81).
Conclusion
The implementation of a multidisciplinary rapid-response pathway significantly improved early intervention, endoscopy utilization, and TIPS procedures in cirrhotic patients with AVB. These changes were associated with marked reductions in both 6-week mortality and 5-day treatment failure. Key independent predictors of 6-week mortality included Child-Pugh score, MELD-Na score, HCC, PVT, and 5-day treatment failure.