Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the impact of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) on esophageal motility and reflux patterns using high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring. By comparing pre- and post-procedure findings in GERD patients, we seek to understand the functional changes induced by TIF and their correlation with symptom relief, providing insights into its role as a therapeutic option for GERD.

Aims & Methods

A prospective controlled study was conducted, enrolling 40 GERD patients, with 20 undergoing TIF and 20 receiving standard medical therapy as a control group. HRM and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring was performed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure to assess:

1. LES function: resting pressure and relaxation.
2. Esophageal body motility: peristaltic amplitude, contractile front velocity (CFV), and prevalence of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).
3. Reflux patterns: total acid and non-acid reflux episodes, esophageal acid exposure time, and symptom-reflux correlation.

Results

Preliminary findings indicate that TIF improves LES function, esophageal motility, and reflux parameters compared to baseline. Key observations include:

• Increased LES resting pressure and improved peristaltic function.
• Reduced prevalence of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).
• Decreased total acid and non-acid reflux episodes and esophageal acid exposure time.

Conclusion

By incorporating pre- and post-procedure manometry and pH-impedance monitoring data, extended follow-up periods, and symptom correlation, this study will enhance the understanding of TIF’s impact on esophageal motility and reflux patterns. Standardizing the evaluation of these changes post-TIF can guide clinical decision-making, ensuring optimal patient selection and improving GERD management strategies.

Disclosure

No conflict of interest

Introduction

Post endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancers (PEUGIC) are often missed opportunities to diagnose earlier or even prevent cancer. Up to 71% of PEUGIC are potentially avoidable, but identifying and investigating them can be challenging. A national process for identifying all PEUGIC in the English National Health Service and performing root cause analysis was developed.

Aims & Methods

Potential PEUGIC between 2017 and 2023 occurring 3-36 months after an index endoscopy which did not result in a cancer diagnosis were identified from National Cancer Registration Dataset and Hospital Episode Statistics held by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. Data from local root cause analysis were uploaded onto a secure portal for national analysis. PEUGIC following surveillance endoscopies were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations with outcomes of interest.

Results

3151 potential PEUGIC were examined by local reviewers in 144 English hospitals. 635 (20%) were excluded on local review and data were available for 2516 PEUGIC. 1897 (75.4%) PEUGIC followed diagnostic, follow-up or screening endoscopies. PEUGIC sites were oesophagus 61%, stomach 34% and duodenum 5%.
Table 1 shows the summary PEUGIC root cause results analysis based on the World Endoscopy Organisation categorisation. Categories C and D were associated with poor outcomes with 29% and 23% of cases receiving curative treatment, respectively. Compared to categories A and B receiving curative treatment in 53% and 37% of cases, respectively. Squamous cell cancers accounted for 37.5% of oesophageal PEUGIC and were associated with no lesion being detected (category C or D) in the PEUGIC segment OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.21-2.43).
Findings on index endoscopy (category A or B) at later oesophageal PEUGIC: pre-malignant lesion 23% (e.g. Barrett’s), cancer associated lesion 20% (e.g. ulcer) and other oesophageal focal lesions 15%. Findings on index endoscopy in gastric PEUGIC: cancer associated lesion 26%, pre-malignant lesion 7% and other gastric focal lesions 18%. 45% of the index endoscopies were classified as inadequate. Patient harm and adverse treatment outcomes were associated with an inadequate index endoscopy OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.28-1.91). The most common reason for inadequate endoscopy was inadequate management of lesions identified, which were most likely to be cancer associated lesions OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11-1.69), specifically oesophageal strictures (24%) and gastric ulcers (23%).
Gastric diagnostic PEUGIC were diagnosed with more advanced cancer (40% stage 4 at diagnosis vs 30% oesophageal PEUGIC). Treatment following cancer diagnosis was adversely affected in 42% of PEUGIC. Reviewers considered that 57% of PEUGIC were at least possibly avoidable and 9% led to premature death.

Table 1 Root causes of all diagnostic PEUGIC

Conclusion

Abnormalities in the area of the later cancer were detected at index endoscopy in 59% of PEUGIC. Inadequate lesion assessment, endoscopy and/or decision making was noted in 45% of PEUGIC, which adversely affected treatment outcome. Oesophageal squamous cell cancer was a common cause of PEUGIC, suggesting issues with lesion recognition in this cancer. Many patients had incurable disease when diagnosed and treatment was adversely affected in 42%.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection is highly prevalent in Portugal, affecting over 60% of the population. Antibiotic resistance poses a significant challenge to Hp treatment; however, empirical regimens remain the standard of care over susceptibility-guided approaches. This study aims to evaluate the most recommended therapeutic options for Hp eradication and to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure.

Aims & Methods

Prospective cohort study conducted in a single centre, including all patients treated for Hp infection between 2013 and 2024. We analysed four eradication regimens: triple therapy (Tri), bismuth quadruple therapy (QuadB), concomitant quadruple therapy (QuadC) and sequential quadruple therapy (QuadS). We collected data on patient demographics and clinical characteristics and compared adherence rates, treatment effectiveness and incidence of adverse events.

Results

Included 591 patients, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 47-66) and female sex 57.2%. The main indication for Hp testing was dyspeptic symptoms (61.1%). The prescribed therapeutic regimens were QuadC in 34.0% of patients, QuadB in 32.8%, Tri in 23.2% and QuadS in 10.0%. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, QuadC (92.9%) and QuadB (90.4%) showed significantly higher eradication rates compared with Tri (73.9%, p<0.001), with no difference observed for QuadS (84.2%, p=0.30 vs QuadC; p=0.61 vs QuadB). Adverse events were significantly less frequent with Tri (0.06%) and QuadS (0.02%) compared to QuadC (0.18%, p<0.01) and QuadB (0.17%, p<0.05), but overall adherence to treatment was 97.1%, with no significant difference among regimens (p=0.19). Logistic regression identified predictive factors for treatment failure: prior eradication attempts (OR 2.31; 95% CI 0.3-1.4), poor adherence (OR 14.5; 95% CI 0.7-4.7) and absence of statin use (OR 2.33; 95% CI 0.07-1.6), with an AUC of 0.72.

Conclusion

QuadC and QuadB therapies are more effective for Hp eradication but are associated with increased rates of adverse events, without a negative impact on overall treatment adherence. Therapeutic failure is more likely in non-naive patients, those with poor adherence to treatment and without statin use.