Introduction

The European Union has signalled gastric cancer screening and prevention as a major health priority. The TOGAS consortium (TOwards GAstric cancer Screening in the European Union; togas.lu.lv), funded in response to this call, investigates different strategies for primary and secondary prevention of gastric cancer in Europe. One pilot study aims at determining the yield of having an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) on the same day of a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or polyp surveillance.

Aims & Methods

This is the first interim data on n=602 individuals recruited in 8 centres across Europe (France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain). Individuals of the age of 50-74 years, attending for screening or surveillance colonoscopy, were invited to participate if they did not have a past diagnosis of gastric preneoplastic conditions requiring surveillance. Standardization of endoscopic procedures was assured by a rigorous protocol including all quality parameters defined by ESGE. This included standards for image documentation and biopsy sampling. Demographics, comorbidities, medication and the previous surgical and family history were recorded. Patients with marked preneoplastic changes (i.e. glandular atrophy or intestinal metaplasia [IM] at OLGA/OLGIM stage 3 or 4, and/or EGGIM score >5) were registered as requiring further endoscopic surveillance. Mann-Whitney U-test was applied for comparison of age between groups and Chi2 test for comparison of categorical variables (significance for p<0.05).

Results

The mean age of participants was 62 years (SD +/- 8.0), with 55.8% being male. Of 245 individuals who underwent an OGD prior to inclusion, 93.1% of these procedures were done >3years before and 60.4% were done at a tertiary centre. We identified 6 (1.0%) malignant/neoplastic lesions, 4 gastric cancers/dysplastic lesions and 2 oesophageal carcinomas. A positive H. pylori status was diagnosed in 34.2%. Endoscopically, a diagnosis of preneoplastic conditions was made in 217 participants (36.0%). Of these, 84 (14.0%) showed gastric atrophy, 45 (7.5%) gastric IM and 75 (12.5%) both conditions combined. Of those with gastric atrophy, this was classified as multifocal in 44 (27.6%) individuals, of those with IM in 45 (37.5%). OLGA stages 3 and 4 were confirmed for 1.9% and 0.8%, OLGIM stages 3 and 4 for 2.3% and 0.4%. Benign ulcers were diagnosed in 28 (4.7%) participants. The majority being gastric ulcers in 19 (3.2%) individuals, duodenal ulcers in 9 (1.5%), and oesophageal ulcers in 2 (0.3%). An additional 13 (2%) participants were diagnosed with Barrett’s oesophagus. It is of note that also 12 (2.0%) colorectal cancers were identified in the cohort. A positive H. pylori status was associated with the need for gastric surveillance (p=0.031).

Conclusion

This interim analysis of the first European pilot study on a combined screening for upper and lower GI tumours shows that this approach is feasible. Regarding the detection of upper GI malignancy and preneoplastic conditions, our findings are in line with previous systematic reviews, but we also demonstrate a reasonable rate of non-malignant findings that are also of relevance when defining the best screening strategy in Europe.

Disclosure

JB: Advisory fee from Flynn Pharma Ltd, Juvise Pharmaceuticals.
MCWS: Research Support from Sysmex, Norgine, Sentinel
OK: Speakers fee, advisory fee from Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Shire.

Introduction

Corpus atrophic gastritis (CAG) requires endoscopic-histological surveillance due to the risk of developing gastric neoplastic lesions (GNL). This study aimed to identify variables associated with GNL development at long-term follow-up using a feature ranking method based on a novel One-Class Support Vector Machine (SVM) model.

Aims & Methods

A dataset containing clinical, endoscopic, and histological variables from consecutive CAG patients (2001-2023) adhering to a surveillance program was considered. GNL presence at the longest available follow-up was recorded. Gastric biopsies and histological evaluations were conducted according to the updated Sydney system. CAG patients with any missing data or a GNL diagnosis at the baseline gastroscopy were excluded from the final analysis. A Fisher score-based feature ranking method and One-Class SVM were used to select the optimal subset of baseline variables associated with GNL development, aiming to achieve average sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) above 80%.

Results

Overall, 355 CAG patients were initially considered. Of these, 36 were excluded due to the presence of GNL at baseline gastroscopy, and 216 for missing data. Thus, a total of 103 patients were considered and grouped into: CAG patients with [22 patients (F 68.1%), median age 68 (35-83) years] and without GNL at follow-up [81 patients (F 72.8%), median age 59(26-84) years]. After a median follow-up of 60 (12-192) months, 13 epithelial GNL (gastric adenocarcinoma or high/low-grade dysplasia) and nine type-1 gastric-neuroendocrine-tumors (T1gNET) were recorded. Parietal-cell-antibodies and pepsinogen-I < 30 μg/l were associated with both epithelial GNL and T1gNET. Antral inflammation and age > 60 were linked to epithelial GNL, while anti-thyroperoxidase-antibodies, smoking, and dyspeptic symptoms at CAG diagnosis were linked to T1gNET. Low-dose aspirin and H. pylori eradication therapy showed inverse associations with epithelial GNL and T1gNET, respectively.

Conclusion

This is the first study in which an AI model simultaneously considers clinical, endoscopic, and histological characteristics from a dataset of CAG patients, showing good sensitivity and specificity in identifying those variables associated with developing GNL. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the need for improved variable standardization and data balancing between groups to enhance model performance further.

Introduction

Pathological esophageal acid exposure may persist in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) despite standard proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and symptom control, although current guidelines recommend at least standard-dose PPI for all patients with BE.¹

Aims & Methods

Aim was to evaluate the role of esophageal function testing in assessing acid exposure in BE patients on PPI therapy and in predicting neoplastic progression. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including asymptomatic BE patients (defined by GerdQ total score <8 and a score of 0 on the first GerdQ item) who underwent high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH impedance monitoring while on various PPI regimens. Maximal PPI therapy included esomeprazole 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, or lansoprazole 30 mg, all administered twice daily. All other regimens were considered standard dosing. Index upper endoscopy with biopsies was performed under the same therapeutic regimen. Histologically, presence and degree of neoplasia (all confirmed by a second pathologist) was recorded. Acid exposure time (AET) <4% was defined as adequate acid control; AET >6% as pathological reflux. Predictors of pathological reflux and neoplasia were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 135 patients (2016-2025) were included (mean age 58 ± 15 years; 73% male). Median BE length was C1 (range 0–3 cm) and M2 (range 1–5 cm), with 41% (n=56) classified as having long-segment BE. Sixty-seven patients (50%) were on standard-dose PPI. Pathological reflux was identified in 37 patients (27%), of whom 25 (67%) were on standard-dose therapy. Fourteen patients (10%) had borderline AET values (4–6%). Among the 84 patients (62%) with adequate acid control, 33 (39%) were taking standard-dose PPI. On multivariable analysis, standard-dose PPI (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.34–6.89; p=0.008) and type III esophagogastric junction morphology (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.01–5.01; p=0.047), consistent with manometric hiatal hernia, were independently associated with pathological reflux. Non-dysplastic BE was found in 112 patients, while 13 (10%) had neoplasia at index endoscopy (8 low-grade dysplasia, 3 high-grade dysplasia, 2 intramucosal adenocarcinoma). Pathological reflux was the only independent predictor of neoplasia (OR 10.41; 95% CI 2.65–41.26; p<0.001).

Table 1. Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with neoplasia on index endoscopy.

	Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
	OR (95% CI)	p-value	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Age, years	1.01 (0.96-1.05)	0.695	-	-
BMI, kg/m2	0.95 (0.83-1-10)	0.957	-	-
Male gender	0.71 (0.19-2.54)	0.783	-	-
PPI standard dose vs maximal	0.85 (0.27-2.69)	0.792	-	-
Long-segment BE vs short	1.70 (0.53-5.52)	0.371	-	-
Ineffective/absent contractility vs normal	0.96 (0.30-3.03)	0.939	-	-
EGJ type III morphology vs I/II	3.98 (1.16-13.71)	0.028	3.18 (0.86-11.78)	0.082
AET >6% vs <6%	11.72 (3.01-45.65)	0.001	10.41 (2.65-41.26)	<0.001

Conclusion

Nearly one-third of asymptomatic BE patients exhibit pathological reflux on pH-monitoring despite PPI treatment, predominantly among those on standard-dose and with manometric hiatal hernia. Nonetheless, adequate acid control is achieved in over one-third of patients on standard PPI therapy. Pathological reflux is associated with a 10-fold increased risk of neoplasia.

References

1. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(4):559-587.

Introduction

Gastric mucosal visibility is essential for high-quality upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. While simethicone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) have been shown to improve mucosal visibility, the optimal time interval between preparation and endoscopy remains undefined.

Aims & Methods

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of timing on mucosal visibility and explored the upper limit beyond which visibility begins to decline.
In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, adult patients undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy were randomized into four groups: placebo, simethicone + NAC with endoscopy performed after 10–20 minutes, 20–30 minutes, and >30 minutes. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving adequate gastric mucosal visibility (GMV), defined as a score of <7 on a validated visibility scale. A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the >30 minute group was performed by stratifying patients into 20-minute intervals (31–50, 51–70, and 71–90 minutes) to assess the durability of mucosal clarity over time.

Results

Comparison	Adequate gastric mucosal visibility (%)	P
10–20 min vs 20–30 min	27% vs 62%	0.001
10–20 min vs >30 min	27% vs 67%	0.001
10–20 min vs Placebo	27% vs 2.6%	0.001
20–30 min vs >30 min	62% vs 67%	0.174
20–30 min vs Placebo	62% vs 2.6%	0.001

1,140 patients (median age 42years, 63.2% males) were included in the study. Adequate GMV was significantly higher in all preparation groups compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The 20–30 minute and >30 minute groups demonstrated the highest rates of adequate visibility (61.5% and 73.5%, respectively), both significantly superior to the 10–20 minute group (26.9%) and placebo (2.6%). In the >30 minute subgroup analysis, the 31–50 minute interval demonstrated the highest adequacy (73.5%). The 51–70 minute group showed moderate adequacy (52.1%), which was not significantly different from the 20–30 minute group (p = 0.207). However, the 71–90 minute group had reduced adequacy (43.8%) and did not differ significantly from the 10–20 minute group (p = 0.145). No adverse events were reported across study arms.

Conclusion

Endoscopy performed between 20 and 50 minutes after mucosal preparation yields optimal gastric mucosal visibility. A decline in visibility beyond 50 minutes suggests a practical upper limit for endoscopy timing following preparation. These findings support structured, time-sensitive scheduling following mucosal cleansing to enhance procedural quality.

Disclosure

None