Introduction
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the standard method for providing long-term enteral nutrition and medication in patients with insufficient oral intake. However, data on the technical aspects of the procedure, adherence to published guidelines, and the decision-making process of endoscopists remain limited in certain countries.
Aims & Methods
The primary aim of this nationwide study was to assess the current practices among Greek gastroenterologists regarding PEG procedure, covering the entire spectrum of PEG, including initial clinical decision-making, technical aspects, periprocedural management, and long-term patient care. An anonymous web-based survey was distributed to every member of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (HSG), including gastroenterology trainees. Participants electronically completed a 36-item questionnaire divided into five sections:
(1) demographics and professional background,
(2) general questions on PEG placement,
(3) specific procedural aspects,
(4) post-procedural management, and
(5) future perspectives.
Data analysis was performed using Stata statistical software, version 17.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
A total of 127 out of 766 members of the HSG responded (response rate: 16.5%). Regarding PEG placement, 66.7% reported involvement in up to two procedures per week. Multidisciplinary team meetings were rarely implemented, with 82.0% stating they “rarely” or “never” participate in such meetings. Neurological disorders were the leading indication for PEG (67.7%), followed by dementia (18.1%) and obstructive head, neck, or esophageal malignancies (11.8%). The primary indications differed significantly between the public and private sectors (P = 0.007), with neurological disorders being more frequently reported in the private sector (40.5% vs 26.1%), while obstructive tumors were less commonly cited as the main indication for PEG placement (1.6% vs 10.3%). The push-PEG technique in malignancy cases was used by 31.7% of respondents, whereas direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (D-PEJ) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J) were employed in 11.9% and 37.8%, respectively. Skin antisepsis and use of sterile instruments were consistently reported by 93.7% and 89.0% of the participants, while prophylactic antibiotics and surgical hand washing were routine for 58.3% and 45.7% of them. Regarding the reported incidence of serious adverse events, 17.3% of respondents had encountered at least one case of perforation or peritonitis, 12.6% reported severe bleeding, and 7.9% had experienced a PEG-related death. No statistically significant association was observed between the occurrence of adverse events and the variables age, years post specialization, trainee status, healthcare sector (public vs private), annual number of PEG procedures, or routine use of prophylactic antibiotics. After discharge, structured follow-up programs were reported by 15.1%, while 31.5% indicated that nutritional guidance was provided by a dedicated nutrition department.
Conclusion
This nationwide survey is the first to explore clinical practices related to PEG placement among gastroenterologists in Greece. The findings highlight areas of alignment with international standards, but also reveal important deviations, particularly in multidisciplinary collaboration, infection prevention measures, and postprocedural care. These results provide a valuable foundation for targeted training agendas and quality improvement initiatives.
References
1. Arvanitakis M, Gkolfakis P, Despott EJ, et al. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 1: Definitions and indications. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021;53(1):81-92. doi:10.1055/a-1303-7449
2. Bischoff SC, Austin P, Boeykens K, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(2):468-488. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.018
Disclosure
Nothing to disclosure.