Introduction
Gastroesophageal varices are present in approximately 50% of cirrhotic patients1. The cirrhosis-related age-standardized mortality is high2. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a medical emergency with a mortality rate of approximately 10-20% at six weeks1, and rebleeding incidence ranged from 32% to 84%3, and even higher, around 90%, in patients receiving no antiviral therapy4. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic variceal obliteration (EVO) with cyanoacrylate are recommended for patients with acute variceal bleeding5, but both treatments have no impact on portal pressure6. Portal hypertension is the primary pathophysiological mechanism underlying gastroesophageal varices. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) induce vasodilation by targeting beta-receptors on blood vessels and the heart, reduce cardiac output through negative inotropic effects, thereby reducing portal blood flow and associated portal pressure7, 8. Gastroesophageal varices type 1 (GOV1) and type 2 (GOV2) are varices in direct continuity from the esophagus to the stomach (lesser and greater curvatures, respectively)9. We chose EVL after EVO for treatment of GOV1 and GOV2, which tended to have a better secondary prophylactic effect according to our clinical experience. However, no prior research has evaluated the effect of additional NSBB under these circumstances. It remains unclear whether the addition of NSBB provides further benefit after combined use of tissue adhesive and endoscopic variceal ligation for bleeding gastroesophageal varices.
Aims & Methods
We retrospectively analyzed cirrhotic patients (mainly due to hepatitis B and C) who received endoscopic combined treatment of gastroesophageal varices and were assigned or not to NSBB treatment as a second prophylaxis. Subanalysis was done for ascites, portal vein thrombosis, splenectomy, and Child-Pugh grade. 5-year overall survival and rebleeding rates were compared between treatment groups.
Results
A total of 490 patients were analyzed, and 130 patients received additional NSBB treatment. Although the additional NSBB treatment did not lead to a statistically significant difference in overall 5-year survival (Log-rank test, p = 0.133), it did reduce the 5-year rebleeding rate from 45.7% to 30.64% (Log-rank test, p = 0.002, univariate COX analysis, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82), consistent with the comparison after propensity score matching. Neither overall survival nor bleeding differed significantly between propranolol and carvedilol. NSBB (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79, p = 0.001) and splenectomy (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.96, p = 0.030) were independent factors in reducing rebleeding, rather than improving survival, in cirrhotic patients who received combined endoscopic treatment. In patients without splenectomy, NSBB treatment improved overall survival (Log-rank test, p = 0.019, univariate COX analysis, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89) and reduced rebleeding rates (Log-rank test, p = 0.001, univariate COX analysis, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.78).
Conclusion
We show for the first time that adding NSBB to combined endoscopic therapy significantly reduced recurrent variceal bleeding (GOV1 & GOV2) in cirrhotic patients, yet did not improve overall survival, except for patients without splenectomy. The addition of NSBB for patients receiving combined endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal varices provides benefits but does not prolong overall survival.
References
1. Jakab SS, Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and Management of Esophageal and Gastric Varices in Patients with Cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2020;24:335-50.
2. Collaborators GBDC. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:245-66.
3. de Franchis R, Primignani M. Natural history of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2001;5:645-63.
4. He L, Ye X, Ma J, et al. Antiviral therapy reduces rebleeding rate in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis with acute variceal bleeding after endotherapy. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:101.
5. de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022;76:959-74.
6. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018;69:406-60.
7. Baiges A, Hernández-Gea V, Bosch J. Pharmacologic prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding. Hepatol Int 2018;12:68-80.
8. Reiberger T, Mandorfer M. Beta adrenergic blockade and decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2017;66:849-59.
9. Alqahtani SA, Jang S. Pathophysiology and Management of Variceal Bleeding. Drugs 2021;81:647-67.
