Introduction

A dysfunctional intestinal mucosal barrier is a key pathophysiological hallmark and driver of a broad range of gastrointestinal diseases including celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. To date, there are no adequate treatment strategies to ameliorate impaired barrier function.
IMU-856 is an orally available and systemically acting small molecule modulator of sirtuin 6 (SIRT6), a histone/non-histone protein deacetylase which serves as a transcriptional regulator of intestinal barrier function and regeneration of bowel epithelium. IMU-856 may represent a new approach to treat gastrointestinal diseases with compromised barrier function.

Aims & Methods

This was a first-in-human, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of IMU-856 in healthy volunteers and patients with celiac disease. In the multiple ascending dose part, healthy human subjects were dosed once-daily for 14 consecutive days with IMU-856 at three different dose levels or placebo. Additionally, the Phase 1/1b study was designed to assess safety and tolerability of IMU-856 at two different dose levels in patients with celiac disease during periods of gluten-free diet and a 15-day gluten challenge. Further objectives included pharmacokinetics and the assessment of histological changes. Biomarkers reflecting intestinal enterocyte mass and function, nutrient absorption, and enteroendocrine hormones like GLP-1 were analyzed to assess potential effects on gut health.

Results

IMU-856 was safe and well-tolerated with a benign adverse event profile and pharmacokinetics that allow once-daily dosing. Treatment with IMU-856 protected against gluten-induced histologic deterioration, improved the health and metabolic function of intestinal enterocytes as measured by nutrient uptake and citrulline [1], and had positive effects on enteroendocrine cells increasing endogenous GLP-1 levels in a dose-dependent manner.

Conclusion

IMU-856 is a safe, highly selective and potent epigenetic modulator, improving the intestinal barrier function in patients with celiac disease undergoing a gluten challenge.
Positive effects of IMU-856 on gut hormones and various biomarkers for overall gut health including intestinal function and integrity were observed. Therefore, IMU-856 may offer extensive potential for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases with compromised intestinal barrier function and metabolic diseases.

References

1. Daveson AJM, Stubbs R, Polasek TM, Isola J, Anderson R, Tye-Din JA, et al. Safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of IMU-856, a SIRT6 modulator, in coeliac disease: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.

Disclosure

AS, MW, EP: employees of Immunic AG, option and shareholders of Immunic, Inc.
IPO, JF, IK, SE: employees of Immunic AG, option and/or shareholders of Immunic, Inc.
HK: employee of Immunic AG, shareholder of Immunic, Inc., co-inventor of patents for the drug in investigation
DP: option holder of Immunic, Inc.
DV, AM: employees of Immunic AG and Immunic, Inc., shareholders of Immunic, Inc., co-inventors of patents for the drug in investigation

Introduction

Side effects, patient preference, and high costs may prompt cessation of anti-TNF therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in sustained remission. Given the risk of relapse, careful patient selection is essential. This study aimed to assess relapse rates and identify predictors of relapse following anti-TNF cessation in UC patients in remission.

Aims & Methods

A systematic search on cohort studies reporting relapse rates after cessation of anti-TNF therapy in ≥30 UC patients in clinical remission was performed 6 September 2024. Individual patient data was requested. We excluded patients with steroid use, ≤6 months anti-TNF therapy, ≤16 years, previous colectomy (n=4), golimumab as anti-TNF therapy (n=3) or without follow-up. Continuation of treatment with immunomodulators or mesalamine at cessation of anti-TNF was allowed. Relapse was defined as the need to (re)start treatment with steroids, anti-TNF or other advanced therapies, or the need for surgical treatment, as applied by the original author. Pooled relapse rates were computed using a random-effects model. A prediction model was built with a Cox proportional hazards model, performance assessed by iteratively leaving one study out (internal-external cross-validation, IECV). Missing covariate data were multiply imputed 100 times using the MICE algorithm. Variable selection was guided by three criteria: ≤20% missing data, a univariate p-value ≤ 0.2, and input from clinical experts.

Results

In total, 654 patients from 8 studies were included in the individual participant data meta-analysis. At anti-TNF cessation, median age was 40 years (IQR 31-51) with a median anti-TNF treatment of 18 months (IQR 18-36). The majority of patients were treated with infliximab (n = 610, 93%). Only 42 patients (9%) received a second-line anti-TNF therapy. The pooled relapse rate were 24% [95% CI 19-29%, I² = 44%] and 34% [95% CI 29-40%, I² = 39] at 1 and 2 years after cessation, respectively. Upon cessation, 211 patients (33%) continued mesalamine, 239 (39%) thiopurines, and 136 (22%) a combination of both. In our model, thiopurine therapy and older age at cessation were associated with a reduced risk of relapse, whereas immunomodulator refractoriness as an indication for starting anti-TNF therapy was associated with an increased risk. Other factors included in the prediction model were disease extent, type of anti-TNF therapy, history of anti-TNF therapy, fecal calprotectin level and endoscopic activity, leading to a c statistic of 0.55 [95% CI 0.51-0.59] (Table 1).

Table 1: Predictors of relapse in a pooled Cox regression analysis

Conclusion

Approximately 1 in 4 patients experience a relapse of UC within 1 year after anti-TNF cessation, increasing to 1 in 3 within 2 years. Continuation of thiopurines is associated with a reduced risk. A prediction model for relapse was developed in this large IPD meta-analysis cohort and may aid in shared decision-making on anti-TNF cessation. However, its limited discriminative ability underscores the need for further refinement, incorporating data on microscopic remission and molecular and immunological markers to better capture deeper disease control.

Introduction

Chronic low-grade inflammation, known as inflammageing, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various digestive diseases. However, large-scale systematic evaluations of the association between inflammageing biomarker profiles and digestive system disorders remain scarce. Understanding these associations may have important implications for early detection and intervention strategies.

Aims & Methods

Leveraging the multidimensional data from the UK Biobank, this study aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationships between circulating inflammatory markers and major digestive diseases. A total of 45,475 participants were included, with inflammageing levels calculated as the average of standardized values of four circulating inflammatory markers: TNF, IL1RN, IL18, and IL6.
Digestive disease outcomes were identified from hospital records (HES) and death registries, covering 25 major diagnoses, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking, and other potential confounders.
In addition, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using GWAS data derived from inflammageing scores to evaluate potential causal effects on digestive outcomes. Mediation and subgroup analyses were performed to explore possible mediating factors.

Results

In the Cox regression analysis, 22 out of 25 digestive outcomes showed significant associations with baseline inflammageing levels (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.05), with HRs ranging from 1.2 to 2.4.
Mediation analysis identified neutrophil counts and LDL-C as important mediators in these associations, suggesting potential biological pathways linking inflammageing to digestive disease development.

Conclusion

Elevated baseline inflammageing levels were significantly associated with a wide spectrum of digestive system diseases. The findings highlight a potential mechanistic role of systemic inflammation in digestive disease pathogenesis. The use of inflammageing-related biomarkers may aid in early identification of high-risk individuals, offering opportunities for early prevention and targeted interventions.